Home » Law » Youview, your view.. Whose view?

Youview, your view.. Whose view?

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page. Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified. This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked. This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

The Eye of Sauron is my view

It has emerged that the long-delayed broadband TV service backed by Lord Sugar has lost its battle over the right to use ‘YouView’ as their trade mark.

The High Court found ‘youview’ to be confusingly similar to ‘Your View’, which is a business to business billing service operated by telecommunications company Total.

The case has centres around two key issues, the similarity between ‘telecommunications services’ and ‘apparatus for television and radio reception’ and it was held that there was a high degree of complementarity between these services. Overall the court found a high degree of similarity between the goods and services of YouView TV Ltd’s trade mark application and Total’s registration.

According to the judgement delivered on November 1st, the marks ‘youview’ and  ‘Your View’ are visually, orally and conceptually similar.  The judge agreed with the initial decision of the hearing officer (from the UK Intellectual Property Office) that the meaning of the words is what would be remembered; a view by the person being addressed – either you or your.  The judge also took into account the stylisation of YouView TV’s mark and the absence of the letter r in the challenged mark. However, Floyd J found the similarity between ‘you’ and ‘your’ can easily fall victim to the missing letter effect and imperfect recollection for the average consumer.

Total is hoping to seek an injunction against YouView TV’s use of the name as well as damages and costs. However, YouView TV have stated they will not back down without a fight, and has no intention of undergoing a rebrand, despite the court ruling.

See also our post on trade mark searching here.

Rachel Cockin     16 November 2012


1 Comment

  1. [...] this month the High Court upheld the UK Intellectual Property Office’s decision that the names were confusingly similar. [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,105 other followers

%d bloggers like this: