Home » Patents » 16th draft of Rules of Procedure of Unified Patent Court

16th draft of Rules of Procedure of Unified Patent Court

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page. Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified. This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked. This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

Unified patent courtThe 16th draft of the Rules of Procedure of the Unified Patent Court has been published and can be found here (16th draft of Rules of Procedure). Helpfully the latest draft has been prepared as a marked-up document which means the amendments are easy to spot.

There’s a fair amount of red lined comments in this draft which IPcopy will take some time to digest. However, a few points of interest are noted below.

  • The 16th draft is accompanied by a “comprehensive digest” which explains the actions taken by the Expert Group chaired by Kevin Mooney.
  • Work on the Rules will now be “taken up under the chairmanship of Johannes Karcher in the Legal Group of the Preparatory Committee which will now examine the draft set of rules at the level of participating EU-Member States.”
  • The publication of the 16th draft is not intended to kick off a further round of written comments.
  • Rule 5 which relates to opting out from the Unified Patent Court now contains a large chunk of text dealing with supplementary protection certificates.
  • Rule 286 which relates to the certificate that a representative is authorised to practice before the Court has been revised. In particular a lawyer within the meaning of Article 48(1) of the UPC Agreement is defined as a “person who is authorised to pursue professional activities under a title referred to in Article 1 of Directive 98/5/EC.” 
  • A copy of the above Directive can be found here.
  • A note to Rule 286(1) has been added which states: “The reference to Swedish jurists in the definition of lawyer in the 15th Draft has resulted in considerable adverse comment and confusion. The definition has been altered to exclude such reference but the status of such persons still needs to be dealt with.”

Mark Richardson 6 March 2014


1 Comment

  1. fish says:

    Thanks for sharing this information !

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 974 other followers

%d bloggers like this: