Home » General Interest » The Intellectual Property Bill – Freedom of Information plus Odds and Sods

The Intellectual Property Bill – Freedom of Information plus Odds and Sods

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page. Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified. This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked. This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.
Parliamentary copyright images are reproduced with the permission of Parliament

Parliamentary copyright images are reproduced with the permission of Parliament

In the fifth part of a series on the Intellectual Property Bill, IPCopy summarises the proposals relating to the Freedom of Information Act plus some other remaining odds & sods that haven’t been covered in the earlier posts. [Note: this post looks at the IP Bill as originally published. We will revisit the IP Bill at a later date to look at amendments introduced in its passage through Parliament.]

Freedom of Information

Clause 19 of the Intellectual Property Bill introduces an exception under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 in relation to pre-publication research information. Where information has been obtained in the course of a programme of research (or derived from such a programme) it is made exempt information if the programme is continuing with a view to the publication, by a public authority or any other person, of a report of the research and disclosure of the information before the date of publication “would, or would be likely to, prejudice the programme, the interests of any individual participating in the programme, the interests of the authority which holds the information, or the interests of another authority.

Odds & Sods

Clause 20 of the Bill introduces a requirement for the Secretary of State to report annually to Parliament on the activities of the Intellectual Property Office and how they’ve contronbuted to economic growth and the promotion of innovation.

Clause 21 relates to the recognition of foreign copyright works and performances and simplifies the process for protecting such copyrighted works. It will, according to the IPO, “result in clearer information for users, and the UK will be able to comply more quickly with our obligations in the future as more countries sign up to the relevant treaties.”

As the Bill moves through Parliament we will provide updates on the progress of the Bill and any amendments made.

Mark Richardson   17 July 2013


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: