Home » Copyright » Copyright – Receiving less than you bargained for?

Copyright – Receiving less than you bargained for?

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page.

Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified.

This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked.

This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

For the avoidance of doubt Keltie LLP and K2 IP Limited have no liability as to the content of IPcopy and any related tweets or social media posts.

copyright symbolIPcopy is pleased to welcome guest contributors Yavan Brar and Alex Canham from Herrington & Carmichael LLP who take a look at the issue of copyright arising in oursourced contractual work.  The article is reproduced with the kind permission of the authors.

A number of businesses now look to outsource non-core functions, particularly in creative areas, to third party contractors. This may be in the form of marketing design work (such as a brochure or an article), software development/maintenance work or a musical composition. However, are commissioning really clear as to the rights they have in the finished product?

On a basic level, copyright will attach to original works of art, literature (including software source code), music and drama. Accordingly, a commissioning business is likely to expect that it will take ownership of any copyright in the works produced, particularly where they provided the specification for the work and paid for its creation.

The default legal position in England & Wales provides that the ultimate author of the relevant “work” (in this case the third party contractor) is credited as the copyright holder, with the commissioner being granted irrevocable licence to use the finished “work”. This problem is compounded by the fact that the party contractor may be entitled, as copyright holder, to reproduce the “work” for other parties. This is unlikely to reflect the true intention of the parties, particularly the commissioning business.

Another common situation, particularly relevant in the software industry, is where a “work” is updated or amended by a third party to such a level that a new copyright is created. Again, this new copyright is likely to vest in the third party contractor and not the commissioning business.

Many businesses fail to distinguish between having a right to use a copyrighted item and owning it. This is particularly relevant if they are looking to sell or licence the copyrighted “work” or even prepare the business for sale, where a diligent purchaser will undoubtedly look to trace the true ownership of the “works” it believes it is buying. Moreover, if a business operates in the United States where a copyright is a registerable asset, it’s imperative that ownership can be clearly identified. It’s important that the trading entity holds all the relevant rights if it is to successfully and lawfully exploit these “works” on a commercial basis.

To avoid an unsatisfactory outcome, it is advisable for the parties to provide for a full assignment of copyright to take place on completion of the project or, in the case of regular works (e.g. software maintenance work or coding updates), on a periodic basis. At the very least, the contract between the parties should be in writing and identify the rights to be assigned and when the assignment is to take place. However, it’s recommended that detailed advice is taken on your specific circumstances to ensure the relevant rights are sufficiently captured and that only your business has the ability to exploit the intrinsic value in the “work” you’ve paid for.

Yavan Brar & Alex Canham    12 November 2013


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: