Home » Trade Marks » Black and White Trade Marks – Change in OHIM/IPO Practice

Black and White Trade Marks – Change in OHIM/IPO Practice

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page. Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified. This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked. This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

pensFollowing on from our recent blog item detailing the changes in dealing with colour marks at the UK IPO and OHIM, we would like to now consider how these decisions will affect our filing practice in respect of new trade mark applications.

Previously, it was common practice to file for a trade mark in black and white, or grey scale, in order to obtain the broadest protection possible. It was accepted that a mark registered in black and white would allow the proprietor to use the mark in colour and maintain protection. Essentially, it allowed for one application to be filed in black and white, instead of numerous applications for various colour combinations.

However, the recent decisions indicate that a black and white trade mark will only provide protection to colour marks where the colour change is so insignificant that it would not be perceived by the average customer. Examples of such insignificant differences are below:

1)

B+W image 1

2)

B+W image 2

3)

B+W image 3

The following marks, however, would be considered as significant differences and therefore would not be considered identical. This means that the black and white image would not protect use of the mark in colour.

1) B+W image 42)B+W image 5

3) B+W image 6

With the above in mind, we can no longer advise clients that a black and white mark will cover all colour variations. Instead, this will need to be assessed on a case by case basis.

It may be the case that a black and white version is filed at the outset, but that potential colour variations should be considered and filed at the same time or at a later date. This also means that clients will need to consider how the mark will be used at the time of filing and in the near future to ensure that they are fully protected.

Additionally, clients who have registered black and white trade marks, in line with the previous practice, will now need to think about filing new applications for their marks in colour, as well as any colour variations they may consider using in the future.

Link – Common Communication on the Common Practice of the Scope of Protection of Black and White (“B&W”) Marks

Charlotte Blakey  29 May 2014

 


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: