Home » Patents » UPC Ratification Progress in the Czech Republic & the Polish Economic Report

UPC Ratification Progress in the Czech Republic & the Polish Economic Report

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page. Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified. This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked. This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

EU flagBack in July we reported that although there was a political will in the Czech Republic to ratify the Unified Patent Court Agreement, there was likely to be a delay until an economic impact assessment could be carried out. Such an assessment in turn could not happen until details of the renewal fees, court fees etc. were published.

The Kluwer Patent Blog is now also reporting that, in addition to the economic factors, there is an issue over the quality of machine translations into Czech. Unlike places like Sweden, Germany and the Netherlands, foreign language knowledge in the Czech Rerpublic is apparently low and so the quality of machine translations within the unitary patent system is important.

The article notes that there are only a relatively low number of valid patents in the Czech Republic and this may be expected to rise once the unitary system becomes active. This is apparently perceived as a concern to SMEs within the country.

IPcopy notes that these arguments have some parallels to the situation in Poland.

Poland, of course, were initially very keen on the idea of the unitary patent system (when they had the EU Council presidency). Subsequently, however, they got cold feet and have, as a consequence, not signed the Unified Patent Court agreement. The Polish position changed following a report from Deloitte. During the European elections earlier this year, an article popped up on the Danish website for the newspaper Information highlighting/reminding the voting public in Denmark  about the situation in Poland.  This article was accompanied by a link to the Deloitte-Poland report in English which can be accessed here. The report of course suggested it would be economically less painful for Poland to stay out of the unitary patent system.

Let’s hope that the parallels between the Czech Republic and Poland don’t play out and that the Czech Republic can move to ratifying the UPC Agreement in due course.

Mark Richardson 10 October 2014


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: