Home » Patents » Unitary patent: News Nuggets (November 2014, Part 2)

Unitary patent: News Nuggets (November 2014, Part 2)

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page.

Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified.

This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked.

This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

For the avoidance of doubt Keltie LLP and K2 IP Limited have no liability as to the content of IPcopy and any related tweets or social media posts.

EU flagAs we approach Christmas we have some more updates on the progress towards the unitary patent package. This post incorporates information gleaned from the EPO Select Committee website, the Unified Patent Court website and also an information update from the UK’s UPC Taskforce.

The Preparatory Committee met for the last time in 2014 on 4 November. Ratification progress was discussed and although no further ratifications are expected in 2014 a number of countries are expecting to ratify in the first half of 2015.

As previously reported there will be a consultation on the subject of the court fees. This is now expected to start in Spring 2015. The feedback from the European Patent Litigation Certificate consultation is being processed and revised Rules are expected to be presented to the Committee at the next meeting (which is expected in February 2015). And on the subject of future meetings, the Preparatory Committee is expected to meet in February, April, June, October and December 2015.

IT Workstream

The prototype case management system can be accessed at http://prototype.unified-patent-court.org/. There have apparently been in excess of 1200 users so far with 200 accounts created. Users have come from almost 50 countries. In response to early feedback a form for a “saisie” order (an application for preserving evidence, UPC rule 192) has been added, and two different versions of the statement of claim for infringement are now on the system.

The tender specification is being prepared and apparently there are some differing security considerations surrounding the issue of identity verification to be considered, patent lawyers and government lawyers apparently having different needs in this area. The prototype will also be assessed in a (final) user workshop in Munich on 27 November.

Legal Workstream

The UK recently held a public consultation on the secondary legislation needed for the UK to ratify the UPC Agreement. The government response to this consultation is expected by the end of this year.

HR and Training Workstream

There was an HR and Training Working Group meeting on 30 October. Training is to begin in January 2015. The UK is expected to be involved with the hosting of internships  of candidate judges (More on this topic here).

Unitary Patent

The EPO Select committee met on 28 and 29 October to continue discussions on renewal fee levels and the administrative rules for the Unitary Patent. Technical amendments to the administrative rules were agreed though one point related to the surrender of unitary patents was left for further discussion next month. A consolidated version of the rules should become available after the next meeting.

The EPO gave a presentation on cost estimates for administering the unitary patent, a simulation regarding SME fee reductions was discussed and a paper on the criteria for distributing renewal fee revenue amongst the participating states was also briefly discussed.

Mark Richardson 11 November 2014

 

 


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: