Home » Patents » Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co Annual Patent Seminar: Bits ‘n Bobs

Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co Annual Patent Seminar: Bits ‘n Bobs

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page.

Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified.

This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked.

This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

For the avoidance of doubt Keltie LLP and K2 IP Limited have no liability as to the content of IPcopy and any related tweets or social media posts.

stacked-booksWe’ve covered the patent case review from the above seminar in some detail but in among the main presentations were a few other points (relating to the unitary patent in Germany and the need to check the UK Patents Register when finding the current granted claims) that stood out and are probably not long enough in their own right for a full post.

Unitary Patent

  • There is apparently a hot debate going on in Germany at the moment whether to allow English as an official language in the (4) local divisions being considered.
  • The facilities ear marked for the German central division are not, it would seem, that large or grand. In fact the comment was made that the UK could host its part of the central division in the street at Holborn and it would be better!

Check the Register

As a final point in a discussion about claim construction the need to check the UK register thoroughly was highlighted. Although patents will generally be republished if amended after grant this may not always be the case.

In EP2093650 some of the claims of the patent were held invalid by virtue of a court order. However, the patent itself was left unamended and instead a note was placed on the UK Ipsum register under the Case Notes tab (see the entry dated 12 September 2014 below).

Ipsum

This illustrates the need to fully check the UK register when dealing with the current claims of any granted UK or EP(UK) patent.

Mark Richardson 26 February 2015


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: