Home » General Interest » Brexit: Labour’s 170 Questions for the Government

Brexit: Labour’s 170 Questions for the Government

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page.

Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified.

This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked.

This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

For the avoidance of doubt Keltie LLP and K2 IP Limited have no liability as to the content of IPcopy and any related tweets or social media posts.

brexit-1481028_1920The Labour Party released a set of 170 Brexit related questions last week to cover each day between 13 October 2016 and the Article 50 notification deadline announced by the Prime Minister at the Conservative Party conference, 31 March 2017.

IPcopy took a quick look at the questions to see whether any were IP themed ones and, if there were any such questions, how far down the list these came.

We found references to the unitary patent system and also to geographical indications.

Geographical Indications

  1. How will the government go about protecting the brand status of the 77 UK products currently covered by the EU’s registration of products under the protected Designation of Origin, Protected Geographical Indication, and Traditional Specialty Guaranteed schemes?

Assuming these questions were actually asked in order, one day at a time, this question would be scheduled for  26 January 2017. A list of the 77 products referred to in this question can be found here.

As noted on the European Commission website, geographical indications are part of the intellectual property rights of the European Union and provide a way of assuring consumers that registered products are genuine and not imitations that are looking to benefit from the name and reputation of the original.

Unified Patent Court

  1. Does the government intend to proceed with ratification of the EU agreement to establish a Unified Patent Court, in the agreement’s present form; and if not, what steps is the government taking to negotiate an alternative agreement to which it would be willing to sign up?

  1. If the Unified Patent Court (UPC) goes ahead, will the Human Necessities seat of its Central Division continue to be located in London, as prescribed in Article 7(2) of the UPC agreement.

Again, assuming these questions were asked in order, the above two questions would be scheduled for 30 and 31 January 2017.

Following the comments made by the Prime Minister at the Conservative conference (see “Did Theresa May just end UK participation in the UPC?”) it would seem that the UK’s continued participation in the UPC would be at odds with the PM’s comments about the CJEU. In order to continue with the unitary patent project it would seem that the UK would first have to “walk back” (at least as far as patents are concerned) its comments about the CJEU. At present, with the PM’s seeming preference for a “Hard Brexit”, this seems to be  unlikely to happen but time will tell. If the Government choose to answer these questions it would certainly bring some clarity to the future of the UPC (at least as far as the UK is concerned) .

Missing from the 170 questions is anything relating to how European trade marks or Registered Community Designs are to be handled post-Brexit. The questions appear roughly two thirds of the way through the list which perhaps indicates their relative level of importance to the powers that be…

Mark Richardson 18 October 2016


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: