Home » Patents » USPTO – Software patent eligibility update

USPTO – Software patent eligibility update

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page.

Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified.

This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked.

This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

For the avoidance of doubt Keltie LLP and K2 IP Limited have no liability as to the content of IPcopy and any related tweets or social media posts.

USThe USPTO issued a new memo to patent examiners on the subject of software patent eligibility on 2 November 2016 following recent precedential decisions in McRo Inc v Bandai Namco Games America and BASCOM Global Internet Services v AT&T Mobility in the Federal Circuit. A further recent precedential, decision Amdocs (Israel) Ltd v Openet Telecom, will be the subject of a further memo. As always the USPTO has updated its subject matter eligibility page on its website.

By way of a quick reminder the USPTO assessment that evaluates whether a claim comprises patent eligible subject matter comprises a two step test:.

Step 1 determines whether the claim is directed to a process, machine, manufacture or composition of matter. If yes, the test proceeds to Step 2A which determines whether the claim is directed to a law of nature, natural phenomena or abstract ideas. If no, the test proceeds to Step 2B to analyse whether the claim as a whole is directed to significantly more than the exception.

The McRo case related to a computer implemented method of automatic lip synchronisation and facial expression examination. The method related to the use of specific computer-implemented rules rather than human artists to set certain features of the animation. Human artists did not use the claimed rules and relied on subjective determinations.

As a result the court held that the McRo invention was not an abstract idea as it related to the incorporation of particular claimed rules in computer animation and was distinguished from Alice where a computer merely was a tool for performing an existing process.

The McRo court cautioned courts against oversimplifying the claims. Within Step 2A above therefore courts should consider the claim as a whole and not try to reduce it to its “gist”

BASCOM related to a system for filtering content retrieved from an Internet computer network. The system comprised elements that were generic computer, network and Internet components when considered individually but the combination comprised a non-conventional and non-generic arrangement of additional elements.

Within Step 2B therefore courts should consider additional elements in combination as well as individually when determining if a claim as a whole amounts to significantly more.

Also noted in the present memo: the Office will be addressing the issue of preemption in more detail in a future update of its SME guidance; and, examiners should avoid relying upon or citing non-precedential decisions unless the facts of the case uniquely match the facts of the case in examination.

Mark Richardson 15 November 2016


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: