Home » Patents » EPO News: change in practice for applications lacking unity

EPO News: change in practice for applications lacking unity

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page.

Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified.

This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked.

This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

For the avoidance of doubt Keltie LLP and K2 IP Limited have no liability as to the content of IPcopy and any related tweets or social media posts.

epologoOn 1 April 2017 the EPO changed its practice slightly for patent applications containing more than one inventive concept (i.e. for applications that the EPO search division has decided lack unity).

Previously, in cases where the EPO thought there was a lack of unity, applicants would receive a communication under either Rule 64 or Rule 164 EPC enclosing a partial search report on the first claimed invention within the claim set and an invitation to pay one or more search fees (at 1300 Euros per additional search).

An extended European search report (EESR), including a written opinion, would then be issued on all the inventions for which a search fee had been paid.

From 1 April 2017 however the partial search report will also be accompanied by a provisional opinion on the patentability of the invention first mentioned in the claims. Applicants will therefore now be able to make their decision on whether to pay additional search fees while being in possession of the EPO’s opinion on the first claimed invention.

This new procedure will apply to directly filed European applications, EP regional phase applications for which a supplementary European search report is carried out under Rule 164(1) EPC and international applications for which the EPO is ISA.

The provisional opinion (which will be issued on new EPO Form 1707) will be for information only and a reply will not be required. Indeed, any such reply filed by an applicant will not be taken into account when the EESR is issued.

See the EPO Notice here.

Mark Richardson 25 April 2017


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: