Home » Patents » Proposed changes to statutory patent fees

Proposed changes to statutory patent fees

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page.

Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified.

This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked.

This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

For the avoidance of doubt Keltie LLP and K2 IP Limited have no liability as to the content of IPcopy and any related tweets or social media posts.

UKIPO fees1Back in June this year IPcopy noted that the UKIPO was running a consultation on proposed changes to statutory patent fees. The Government has now published its response and it appears that the UKIPO will now be joining the EPO in charging both excess claim fees and additional page fees.

It is noted that the proposed changes will require amendments to both the Patents (Fees) Rules 2007 and the Patents Rules 2007 but the Government anticipates a commencement date of 6 April 2018.

By way of a brief recap the consultation presented four proposals relating to pre-grant fees and an alternative proposal of some more modest pre-grant fee increases combined with some increases in post-renewal fees.

In light of the feedback received to the consultation the UKIPO is planning to proceed with an increase to the application fee, search and exam fees as discussed in the consultation. Excess claims and pages fees will also be introduced but these will be of a more modest nature than envisaged in the consultation.

It is noted that only 23 responses were received to the consultation. IPcopy wonders whether the UKIPO can set up a mailshot service that interested parties could sign up to so that consultations such as this are more widely circulated.

The proposed changes detailed by the Government in the response are as follows:

  • Application fee to rise from £30 to £90 (paper applications) and £20 to £60 (e-filings) and a surcharge of 25% if the application fee is not paid on filing.
  • Search fees to rise to £150 (UK search filed electronically), £180 (UK search filed on paper), £120 (international application (UK), filed electronically) and £150 (international application (UK), filed on paper). Substantive exam fees to rise to £100 (e-filed) and £130 (paper filing).
  • Excess claim fee of £20 per claim applying to Claims 26 and above. A new grant fee will be payable if the number of excess claim fees increases. It is noted that the original excess claim fee proposal was £30 on Claims 16 and above but this section of the consultation received a number of negative comments. It is also noted that the “average” UK application contains 22 claims.
  • Additional page fee of £10 per page over 35 pages, to be paid with the substantive exam fee. It is noted that the consultation originally envisaged the additional page fee being payable on filing but the proposal was modified in light of feedback. IPcopy notes that this modification will not apparently help applicants who wish to take advantage of combined search and exam at the UKIPO.
  • Renewal fees – £10 increase to patent renewal fees for years 12 onwards.

An Impact Assessment was also published by the Government in addition to the response document. The Impact Assessment notes that the proposed fee increases are designed to help the UKIPO in a number of ways, namely: discouraging “hopeless” applications which are filed “not by business but by lone individuals who are convinced they have invented something new, when they have not” (burn); encouraging applicants to draft more concise and clearer applications (not always possible of course to get concise applications where the subject matter is complex, e.g. in the telecommunications or biotechnology fields); and reducing (slightly) the IPO’s reliance on renewal fees to recoup the costs of processing a patent application by shifting a greater percentage of costs of processing a patent application into the pre-grant phase.

Mark Richardson 10 October 2017


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: