Home » Patents » Law in the Global Marketplace – Hogan Lovells Annual Patent Conference

Law in the Global Marketplace – Hogan Lovells Annual Patent Conference

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page.

Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified.

This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked.

This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

For the avoidance of doubt Keltie LLP and K2 IP Limited have no liability as to the content of IPcopy and any related tweets or social media posts.

stacked-booksHogan Lovells demonstrated its global reach by holding its annual UK patent conference in London as a joint session with its “Law in the Global Marketplace” conference in California.  A presentation on the current status of the UPC was made from London, an update on US patent legislation was made from California, and a transatlantic panel session followed (chaired from London by a German).  The session was interesting, and featured a variety of views leading to an open discussion.  Highlights follow below.

  • Hogan Lovells have conducted an extensive survey of patent holders (discussed here) to determine their attitude to use of the UPC – the level of comfort with the UPC is rising, but patent holders are generally planning to opt key existing patents out of the UPC.
  • Discussion of UPC opt-out was lively and interesting – opt-out with a tactically timed opt-in is a strategy under active evaluation.
  • Concern was expressed from the US that individual jurisdictions may attempt to attract business by patentee-friendly attitudes (along the lines of the Eastern District of Texas, which is taking an ever increasing share of US first instance patent litigation).
    • European delegates were less concerned about this because of the measures taken to harmonise the judging panels.
    • US delegates noted that patentee-friendliness of process, rather than the attitude of the judges, may determine favoured jurisdictions in forum shopping, given that most cases settle.
  • The prospects of further US patent law reform are significant – bills are progressing quietly but smoothly through Congress
    • Much of the focus is on reducing perceived unfair advantages to NPEs (requiring further detail in pleading, limiting discovery, limiting recoverable costs)
    • A secondary focus is harmonising standards between the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and the District Court

Richard Lawrence 9 November 2015


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: