Home » Patents » UK UPC Ratification Progress

UK UPC Ratification Progress

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page.

Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified.

This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked.

This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

For the avoidance of doubt Keltie LLP and K2 IP Limited have no liability as to the content of IPcopy and any related tweets or social media posts.

GB+EU flagThe draft “The Patents (European Patent with Unitary Effect and Unified Patent Court) Order 2016” made its way through debate and approval in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords recently. This gets the UK that little bit closer to being in a position to ratify the UPC Agreement*.

IPcopy wondered whether the possibility of Brexit might slow the process down but feedback that we’ve received from the UKIPO suggests that the UK still expects to be ready in time for the Court’s opening in early 2017. In public therefore the party line is most definitely that Brexit won’t happen and we will carry on under that basis.

The transcripts of the debates in the House of Commons and House of Lords are an entertaining read though they do contain a couple of sections that might raise the odd eyebrow.

In the House of Commons debate, the Minister for Culture and the Digital Economy (Edward Vaizey) stated that the court fees for the UPC would range from 100 Euros to  300,000 Euros for the highest value cases.

As well as misquoting the top value based fee (it is 325,000 Euros in the latest proposal from the Preparatory Committee), IPcopy notes that the Minister has merged different fee classes together here. The fixed fees for starting an infringement action (or lodging a counterclaim for invalidity) are 11,000 Euros which obviously doesn’t sound half as reasonable as a fee of 100 Euros!

So where does the 100 Euro fee come from? It’s for an application to prolong the period of a protective letter kept on the register!

The other interesting comment was around the impact of Brexit where the Minister suggested that “if we left Europe as a result of the referendum, I suspect it would be a decision for the UK Government whether they wanted to rejoin the European patent court. Of couse, we would have to rely on our European partners to decide whether the UK could be a member“. Of course, if the UK does leave the EU it will not be possible for the UK to take part in the unitary patent system. As noted in the UPC Agreement itself “‘Member State’ means a Member State of the European Union”.

Mark Richardson 15 March 2016

*The above Statutory Instrument (SI) is not the only SI that the UK needs to push through however and the IPO also confirmed that an SI relating to the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities will also be needed.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: